4.5 Article

The Anti-Amyloid-beta Monoclonal Antibody 4G8 Recognizes a Generic Sequence-Independent Epitope Associated with alpha-Synuclein and Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Amyloid Fibrils

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 517-525

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150696

关键词

Amyloid; amyloid-beta; conformation; monoclonal antibody; IAPP; synuclein

资金

  1. NIH [AG 033069, AG00538]
  2. Cure Alzheimer's fund
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG033069, P01AG000538] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently we reported that several monoclonal antibodies that recognize linear segments of amyloid-beta (A beta) also recognize amyloid fibrils, but not monomers of unrelated sequences, indicating that recognition of a linear sequence segment is not a reliable indicator of sequence specificity. We asked whether any of the commonly used commercially available A beta antibodies also recognize fibrils of unrelated sequence. Here we report that 4G8, which recognizes residues 18-23 of the A beta sequence and is widely believed to be sequence-specific, also recognizes fibrils formed from alpha-synuclein and islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP). The recognition of amyloid fibrils is aggregation-dependent because 4G8 does not recognize alpha-synuclein or IAPP monomer. 4G8 also stains fibrillar alpha-synuclein aggregates in human multiple system atrophy brain where it colocalizes with anti-alpha-synuclein monoclonal antibody LB509 immunoreactivity. We also found that LB509 recognizes A beta fibrils, but not monomer, indicating that generic epitope-reactive antibodies are also produced in response to alpha-synuclein immunization. Taken together, our results indicate that generic fibril conformational epitope specificity may be a pervasive property among monoclonal antibodies raised against amyloid-forming antigens and that the specificity of their immunoreactivity should be rigorously established and otherwise interpreted with caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据