4.6 Article

The maternal Mediterranean dietary pattern is associated with a reduced risk of spina bifida in the offspring

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01963.x

关键词

Factor analysis; folate; Mediterranean diet; neural tube defect; reduced rank regression

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-MW), The Hague, the Netherlands [925-01-006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis whether a maternal dietary pattern is associated with the risk of spina bifida (SB) in the offspring. Case-control study. Eight clinic sites in the Netherlands, 1999-2001. A total of 50 mothers of children with SB and 81 control mothers. Maternal food intakes were obtained by food frequency questionnaires at the standardised study moment of 14 months after the birth of the index child. Principal component factor analysis (PCA) and reduced rank regression (RRR) were used to identify dietary patterns. Maternal biomarkers were used as response measures in the RRR analysis and composed of serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate, serum vitamin B12 and total plasma homocysteine. The strength of the use of the dietary pattern in association with SB risk was estimated by odds ratios and 95% CI with the highest quartiles of the dietary pattern as reference. A predominantly Mediterranean dietary pattern was identified by both PCA and RRR. Those dietary patterns were highly correlated (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) and characterised by joint intakes of fruit, vegetables, vegetable oil, alcohol, fish, legumes and cereals and low intakes of potatoes and sweets. We observed a significantly increased risk of SB offspring in mothers with a weak use of the Mediterranean dietary pattern, OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.2-6.1) and OR 3.5 (95% CI 1.5-7.9). The Mediterranean dietary pattern was correlated with higher levels of serum and RBC folate, serum vitamin B12 and lower plasma homocysteine. The Mediterranean dietary pattern seems to be associated with reduction in the risk of offspring being affected by SB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据