4.6 Article

Fear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02002.x

关键词

Caesarean section; fear of childbirth; VAS; W-DEQ

资金

  1. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  2. Helsinki University Central Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine fear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history. A questionnaire study. 1400 unselected pregnant women in outpatient maternity clinics of a university central hospital. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) and preferred mode of delivery. W-DEQ and VAS scores according to parity, gestational age, obstetric history, and preferred mode of delivery. The W-DEQ and VAS scores were higher in nulliparous (W-DEQ 72.0 +/- 20.0 [mean +/- SD] and VAS 4.7 [median]) than parous women (65.4 +/- 21.9; 3.2, P < 0.001 for both W-DEQ and VAS). Higher W-DEQ and VAS scores were found for those beyond 21 weeks of gestation compared with those before (W-DEQ 71.6 +/- 23.0 versus 66.6 +/- 20.0, P < 0.001; VAS 4.7 versus 3.2, P < 0.001). Caesarean section was preferred mode of delivery for 8.1% and these women scored higher on fear (W-DEQ 87.6 +/- 26.5, VAS median 7.0) than those who preferred vaginal delivery (W-DEQ 61.8 +/- 18.7, VAS 2.7, P < 0.001, respectively). Those with a previous caesarean scored higher on fear (W-DEQ 73.2 +/- 23.5, VAS 5.1) than parous women without previous caesarean (W-DEQ 63.3 +/- 20.8, VAS 2.9, P < 0.001, respectively). Those with a history of a vacuum extraction (VE) (W-DEQ 70.6 +/- 19.7, VAS 5.0) had higher fear scores than those without (W-DEQ 64.8 +/- 22.0, P < 0.05 and VAS 3.0, P < 0.001). Severe fear of childbirth was more common in nulliparous women, in later pregnancy, and in women with previous caesarean section or VE. Caesarean section as a preferred mode of childbirth was strongly associated with high score in both W-DEQ and VAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据