4.2 Article

Institute of Medicine 2009 Gestational Weight Gain Guideline Knowledge: Survey of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Family Medicine Residents of the United States

期刊

BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 237-246

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/birt.12061

关键词

pregnancy; weight gain; counseling

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000161, KL2 TR000160, KL2TR000160] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In 2009, the Institute of Medicine revised gestational weight gain recommendations; revisions included body mass index (BMI) category cut-point changes and provision of range of gain for obese women. Our objective was to examine resident prenatal caregivers' knowledge of revised guidelines. Methods: Anonymous electronic survey of obstetrics/gynecology and family medicine residents across the United States from January to April 2010. Results: Overall, 660 completed the survey; 79 percent female and 69 percent aged between 21 and 30. When permitted to select >= 1 response, 87.0 percent reported using BMI to assess weight status at initial visits, 44.4 percent reported using clinical impression based on patient appearance, and 1.4 percent reported not using any parameters. When asked the most important baseline parameter for providing recommendations, 35.8 percent correctly identified prepregnancy BMI, 2.1 percent reported I don't provide guidelines, and 4.5 percent reported I do not discuss gestational weight gain. Among respondents, 57.6 percent reported not being aware of new guidelines. Only 7.6 percent selected correct BMI ranges for each category, and only 5.8 percent selected correct gestational weight gain ranges. Only 2.3 percent correctly identified both BMI cutoffs and recommended gestational weight gain ranges per 2009 guidelines. Conclusions: Guideline knowledge is the foundation of accurate counseling, yet resident prenatal caregivers were minimally aware of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines almost a year after their publication.( BIRTH 40:4 December 2013)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据