4.7 Article

Methods to estimate daily evapotranspiration from hourly evapotranspiration

期刊

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 129-139

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.11.008

关键词

Evapotranspiration; Scale up; Time series; Water management; The northern China

资金

  1. Non-Profit Industry Financial Program of MWR [201501016]
  2. Chinese National Natural Science Fund [51379217, 91425302, 51409277]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA102904]
  4. Special Fund of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research [2016TS06, 1503]
  5. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2012BAD08B04-6]
  6. IWHR Research & Development Support Program [HY0145B152015]
  7. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [201258]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remote sensing provides an effective way for the estimation of regional evapotranspiration, therefore, a reliable scaling-up method from instantaneous evapotranspiration (ET) to daily ET is of great importance. In this paper, five commonly used scaling-up methods estimating daily ET from hourly latent heat measurements were compared under different energy and crop growing conditions. Field data collected during the whole growing season at 1.0 h intervals by eddy covariance system in North China were used. Evaporative fraction (EF), reference evaporative fraction (K-c), crop coefficient (modified-K-c) and surface resistance (r(c)) varied slightly during the daytime, which gave a solid theoretical basis for the scaling-up methods based on the constant value of these parameters. In most cases, the EF and K-c methods performed better than the others, the relative bias from 9:00-16:00 for the two methods ranged from -11.2% to 5.9% and -6.6% to 4.8%, respectively. The EF method was applicable when surface energy was limited, when R-n was less than 50 W m(-2); the average modified coefficient of efficiency of EF method during the daytime from 9 am to 5 pm was 0.68, which is around twice that of the second best method. The K-c and the modified-K-c methods were applicable when surface energy was relatively large. The performance of the five methods didn't seem sensitive to variation of leaf area. Overall, the K-c and EF methods performed better, especially between 11:00 and 15:00. The results of this paper could be useful for optimisation of ET models. (c) 2016 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据