4.5 Article

Functional analysis of rare variants in mismatch repair proteins augments results from computation-based predictive methods

期刊

CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 519-533

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1326439

关键词

Colon cancer; colorectal cancer predisposition; mismatch repair; rare variant; variants of uncertain significance

类别

资金

  1. NCI Core Grant [P30 CA06927]
  2. Temple Genomic Research Funding [R01 DK108195, T32 CA09035, R01 GM084453]
  3. FCCC Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowships
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA006927, T32CA009035] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM084453, R35GM122517] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cancer-predisposing Lynch Syndrome (LS) arises from germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predominantly MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. A major challenge for clinical diagnosis of LS is the frequent identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in these genes, as it is often difficult to determine variant pathogenicity, particularly for missense variants. Generic programs such as SIFT and PolyPhen-2, and MMR gene-specific programs such as PON-MMR and MAPP-MMR, are often used to predict deleterious or neutral effects of VUS in MMR genes. We evaluated the performance of multiple predictive programs in the context of functional biologic data for 15 VUS in MLH1, MSH2, and PMS2. Using cell line models, we characterized VUS predicted to range from neutral to pathogenic on mRNA and protein expression, basal cellular viability, viability following treatment with a panel of DNA-damaging agents, and functionality in DNA damage response (DDR) signaling, benchmarking to wild-type MMR proteins. Our results suggest that the MMR gene-specific classifiers do not always align with the experimental phenotypes related to DDR. Our study highlights the importance of complementary experimental and computational assessment to develop future predictors for the assessment of VUS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据