3.9 Article

Artesunate: Developmental toxicity and toxicokinetics in monkeys

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.20163

关键词

artesunate; monkey; embryolethality; teratogenicity; malformations; cardiovascular; bone; anemia; erythroblasts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The developmental toxicity, toxicokinetics, and hematological effects of the antimalarial drug, artesunate, were previously Studied in rats and rabbits and have now been studied in cynomolgus monkeys. METHODS: Groups of Lip to 15 pregnant females were dosed on Gestation Days (GD) 20-50 or for 3-7-day intervals. RESULTS: At 30 mg/kg/day, 6 embryos died between GD30 and GD40. Histologic examination of 3 live embryos (GD26-GD36) revealed a marked reduction in embryonic erythroblasts and cardiomyopathy. At 12 mg/kg/day, 6 embryos died between GD30 and GD45. Four surviving fetuses examined on GD100 had no malformations, but long bone lengths were slightly decreased. At the developmental no-adverse-effect-level (4 mg/kg/day), maternal plasma AUC was 3.68 ng.h/mL tor artesunate and 6.93 ng.h/ml for its active metabolite, dihydroartemisinin (DHA). No developmental toxicity occurred with administration of 12 mg/kg/day for 3 or 7 days, GD29-31 or GD27-33 (maternal plasma AUC of 9.84 ng.h/mL artesunate and 16.4 ng.h/mL DHA). Exposures at embryotoxic doses were substantially lower than human therapeutic exposures. However, differences in monkey and human Vss for artesunate (0.5 L/kg vs. 0.18 L/kg) confound relying solely on AUC for assessing human risk. Decreases in reticulocyte count occur at therapeutic doses in humans. Changes to reticulocyte Counts at embryotoxic doses in monkeys ( ! 12 mg/kg/day) were variable and generally minor. CONCLUSIONS: Artesunate was embryolethal at >= 12 mg/kg/day when dosed for at least 12 days at the beginning of organogenesis, but not when dosed for 3 or 7 days, indicating that developmental toxicity of artesunate is dependent upon duration of closing in cynomologus monkeys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据