4.2 Review

Consequences of Seed Dispersal for Plant Recruitment in Tropical Forests: Interactions Within the Seedscape

期刊

BIOTROPICA
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 666-681

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12071

关键词

community diversity; density-dependent mortality; frugivores; habitat quality; population demography; recruitment limitation; seed dispersal effectiveness; spatial point patterns

类别

资金

  1. Mathematical Biosciences Institute
  2. National Science Foundation [DMS 0931642, DEB 0816465, DEB 1258148]
  3. Rice University Huxley Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seed dispersal sets the stage for the suite of biotic and abiotic interactions that determine the fate of individual seeds. In this review, we first focus on how dispersal influences the seedscape', or the combination of abiotic and biotic factors that affect the probability of recruitment once a seed has reached its final location. We review recent papers that examine the effect of different dispersal vectors on (1) the quality of the habitat in which a seed lands; (2) the distance seeds are dispersed from the parent tree; and (3) the density and composition of plants within the neighborhood of a seed following deposition. Next, we explore methods used to scale these processes up to the level of populations. We highlight demographic models that integrate across multiple life history stages and predict the impact of dispersal in variable environments on population growth. We also review studies that analyze existing spatial patterns of trees within large forest plots and use various strategies to infer the processes that led to those patterns. We continue to scale up from populations to communities, and discuss approaches that have been taken to understand how dispersal may affect diversity and abundance in the community. We then turn to human disturbances and discuss the implications of frugivore defaunation for plant communities. We finish by highlighting several areas of research that are particularly promising for future directions of study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据