4.2 Article

Emergent Impacts of Ant and Spider Interactions: Herbivory Reduction in a Tropical Savanna Tree

期刊

BIOTROPICA
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 498-505

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00850.x

关键词

cerrado vegetation; intraguild interactions; multiple predator effects; top-down effect

类别

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia dos Himenopteros Parasitoides da Regiao Sudeste (Hympar/Sudeste)
  3. Capes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple predators often have effects on their common prey populations that cannot be predicted by summing the effects of each predator at a time. When predators forage on the same vegetation substrate, intraguild interactions might cause emergent outcomes for the plants on which the predators co-occur. We experimentally evaluated the effects of spiders and ants on herbivory and reproduction in the extrafloral nectary-bearing tree Qualea multiflora (Vochysiaceae). Plants were divided in four experimental groups, depending on the presence or absence of ants and spiders. We compared the effects of each treatment on richness and abundance of chewing and sucking herbivores and on herbivory (leaf area loss). We also evaluated the impact of predators on the production of buds, fruits and seeds, and weight of the fruits. The presence of ants reduced the abundance and richness of spiders, but spiders did not affect the abundance and richness of ants. Only the removal of ants resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of herbivores and herbivore richness. Herbivory, however, was also affected by spiders. In addition, we found a significant interaction effect of ants and spiders on herbivory, indicating an emergent multiple predator effect. Neither ants nor spiders had an impact on the number of buds produced, number of fruits per bud, and seeds per fruits or fruit weight. This study highlights the importance of evaluating the effect of the predator fauna as a whole and not only one specific group on herbivory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据