4.2 Article

Moderate Human Disturbance of Rain Forest Alters Composition of Fruiting Plant and Bird Communities

期刊

BIOTROPICA
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 427-436

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00809.x

关键词

community composition; forest conservation; frugivory; Trinidad and Tobago; guilds; plant-bird interactions; tropical rain forest

类别

资金

  1. NSERC-Canada
  2. PREA-Ontario
  3. Munk Centre for International Studies
  4. NSERC
  5. OGS-Ontario
  6. University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forests worldwide are experiencing rapid environmental change due to human activity. We aimed to increase understanding of anthropogenic impacts on community composition and species interactions. In a natural experiment, we asked whether subsistence human land use has altered the community composition of a Neotropical rain forest on the island of Tobago, in the West Indies. We surveyed fruiting plants and birds in three adjacent habitat types that varied in level of disturbance, and used multivariate analyses to determine whether changes in the plant community were associated with differences in avifauna composition. The three forest habitats had similar plant and bird diversities, yet markedly different species compositions and abundances. Primary forest had the most diverse plant community, while disturbed habitats had a more homogeneous plant composition. Primary and disturbed forest had distinct community compositions, with canopy cover and the relative abundance of plant types explaining 83 percent of the variation in bird species assemblages. Seemingly moderate human disturbance has led to substantial changes in the plant and bird assemblages of Tobago's rain forest, outside of a protected reserve. Our study highlights the direct links between human disturbance and the structure of rain forests, underscoring the impact of even moderate activity on community composition. Foreign language abstract is available in the online version of this article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据