4.3 Article

Estimating Cell Specific Oxygen Uptake and Carbon Dioxide Production Rates for Mammalian Cells in Perfusion Culture

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1347-1357

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.646

关键词

cell culture; CHO cells; metabolic flux analysis; q(CO2); q(O2); RQ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present robust methods for online estimation of cell specific oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production rates (q(O2) and q(CO2), respectively) during perfusion cultivation of mammalian cells. Perfusion system gas and liquid phase mass balance expressions for oxygen and carbon dioxide were used to estimate q(O2), q(CO2) and the respiratory quotient (RQ) for Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in perfusion culture over 12 steady states with varying dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and temperature set points. Under standard conditions (DO 50%, pH = 6.8, T = 36.5 degrees C), q(O2) and q(CO2) ranges were 5.14-5.77 and 5.31-6.36 pmol/cell day, respectively, resulting in RQ values of 0.98-1.14. Changes to DO had a slight reducing effect on respiration rates with q(O2) and q(CO2) values of 4.64 and 5.47, respectively, at DO 20% and 4.57 and 5.12 at DO = 100%. Respiration rates were lower at low pH with q(O2) and q(CO2) values of 4.07 and 4.15 pmol/cell day at pH = 6.6 and 4.98 and 5.36 pmol/cell day at pH = 7. Temperature also impacted respiration rates with respective q(O2) and q(CO2) values of 3.97 and 4.02 pmol/cell day at 30.5 degrees C and 5.53 and 6.25 pmol/cell day at 37.5 degrees C. Despite these changes in q(O2) and q(CO2) values, the RQ values in this study ranged from 0.98 to 1.23 suggesting that RQ was close to unity. Real-time q(O2) and q(CO2) estimates obtained using the approach presented in this study provide additional quantitative information on cell physiology both during bioprocess development and commercial biotherapeutic manufacturing. (C) 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 27: 1347-1357, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据