4.6 Article

A global relation of fire smoke re-circulation behaviour in urban street canyons

期刊

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 459-469

出版社

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2014.890656

关键词

critical re-circulation wind velocity; Froude number; fire smoke dispersion; street canyon

资金

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China [40975005]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB719702]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-09-0914]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Street canyon, formed by buildings along two sides of a road, is an important and ubiquitous architectural element in the metropolises. When a fire occurs in an urban street canyon, a critical serious phenomenon is found to happen where the uprising fire smoke is re-circulated back into the base of the street canyon by the wind flow beyond a critical velocity. Theoretical analysis is derived based on Froude number (Fr), by balancing the inertial force of the wind flow to the buoyancy strength of the fire smoke. It is found that the critical re-circulation wind velocity is proportional to an integrated global parameter [GRAPHICS] . Large Eddy Simulations (LES) are carried out by Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). The critical Froude number (Fr) is found to be about 0.7 similar to 0.8. The simulation results are well collapsed by the generalized theoretical relation. It is further revealed that the non-dimensional critical re-circulation wind velocity [GRAPHICS] against aspect ratio of street canyons in the skimming flow pattern (W/H < 1.43) falls into two behavioural regimes, where it firstly increases then remains constant with the increase in street canyon aspect ratio (W/H) with a turning point at W/H = 1. A global non-dimensional relation is finally achieved for the critical re-circulation wind velocity (u), fire heat release rate [GRAPHICS] and its height (H) to the top of the street canyon as well as the street canyon aspect ratio (W/H).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据