4.3 Article

Selectivity and Delignification Kinetics for Oxidative Short-Term Lime Pretreatment of Poplar Wood, Part I: Constant-Pressure

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 976-985

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.590

关键词

kinetics; delignification; biomass; biofuels; poplar wood; modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinetic models applied to oxygen bleaching of paper pulp focus on the degradation of polymers, either lignin or carbohydrates. Traditionally, they separately model different moieties that degrade at three different rates: rapid, medium, and slow. These models were successfully applied to lignin and carbohydrate degradation of poplar wood submitted to oxidative pretreatment with lime at the following conditions: temperature 110-180 degrees C, total pressure 7.9-21.7 bar, and excess lime loading of 0.5 g Ca(OH)(2) per gram dry biomass. These conditions were held constant for 1-6 h. The models properly fit experimental data and were used to determine pretreatment selectivity in two fashions: differential and integral. By assessing selectivity, the detrimental effect of pretreatment on carbohydrates at high temperatures and at low lignin content was determined. The models can be used to identify pretreatment conditions that selectively remove lignin while preserving carbohydrates. Lignin removal >= 50% with glucan preservation >= 90% was observed for differential glucan selectivities between similar to 10 and similar to 30 g lignin degraded per gram glucan degraded. Pretreatment conditions complying with these reference values were preferably observed at 140 degrees C, total pressure >= 14.7 bars, and for pretreatment times between 2 and 6 h depending on the total pressure (the higher the pressure, the less time). They were also observed at 160 degrees C, total pressure of 14.7 and 21.7 bars, and pretreatment time of 2 h. Generally, at 110 degrees C lignin removal is insufficient and at 180 degrees C carbohydrates do not preserve well. (C) 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 27: 976-985, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据