4.4 Article

Culture of human mesenchymal stem cells on microcarriers in a 5 l stirred-tank bioreactor

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 1233-1245

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10529-013-1211-9

关键词

Bioreactor; Human mesenchymal stem cells; Metabolite profiles microcarriers; Proliferation; Regenerative medicine bioprocessing; Spinner-flask

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC
  2. UK)
  3. Bioprocessing Research Industries Club (BRIC)
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC
  5. UK)
  6. Lonza GmbH (Cologne, Germany)
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the first time, fully functional human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have been cultured at the litre-scale on microcarriers in a stirred-tank 5 l bioreactor, (2.5 l working volume) and were harvested via a potentially scalable detachment protocol that allowed for the successful detachment of hMSCs from the cell-microcarrier suspension. Over 12 days, the dissolved O-2 concentration was > 45 % of saturation and the pH between 7.2 and 6.7 giving a maximum cell density in the 5 l bioreactor of 1.7 x 10(5) cells/ml; this represents > sixfold expansion of the hMSCs, equivalent to that achievable from 65 fully-confluent T-175 flasks. During this time, the average specific O-2 uptake of the cells in the 5 l bioreactor was 8.1 fmol/cell h and, in all cases, the 5 l bioreactors outperformed the equivalent 100 ml spinner-flasks run in parallel with respect to cell yields and growth rates. In addition, yield coefficients, specific growth rates and doubling times were calculated for all systems. Neither the upstream nor downstream bioprocessing unit operations had a discernible effect on cell quality with the harvested cells retaining their immunophenotypic markers, key morphological features and differentiation capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据