4.8 Article

Surface Features of Recombinant Spider Silk Protein eADF4(kappa 16)-Made Materials are Well-Suited for Cardiac Tissue Engineering

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 36, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201701427

关键词

adhesion; cardiac tissue engineering; cell-material interactions; eADF4(kappa 16); engineered spider silk proteins

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [EN 453/11-1, FOR2149]
  2. Bavarian Research Foundation [DOK-175-15]
  3. Bavarian Polymerinstitute Keylab Adaptive Biomanufacturing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular diseases causing high morbidity and mortality represent a major socioeconomic burden. The primary cause of impaired heart function is often the loss of cardiomyocytes. Thus, novel therapies aim at restoring the lost myocardial tissue. One promising approach is cardiac tissue engineering. Previously, it is shown that Antheraea mylitta silk protein fibroin is a suitable material for cardiac tissue engineering, however, its quality is difficult to control. To overcome this limitation, the interaction of primary rat heart cells with engineered Araneus diadematus fibroin 4 (kappa 16) (eADF4(kappa 16)) is investigated here, which is engineered based on the sequence of ADF4 by replacing the glutamic acid residue in the repetitive unit of its core domain with lysine. The data demonstrate that cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells attach well to eADF4(kappa 16) films on glass coverslips which provide an engineered surface with a polycationic character. Moreover, eADF4(kappa 16) films have, in contrast to fibronectin films, no hypertrophic effect but allow the induction of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Finally, cardiomyocytes grown on eADF4(kappa 16) films respond to pro-proliferative factors and exhibit proper cell-to-cell communication and electric coupling. Collectively, these data demonstrate that designed recombinant eADF4(kappa 16)-based materials are promising materials for cardiac tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据