4.2 Article

Cold Exposure Differentially Stimulates Angiogenesis in BAT and WAT of Mice: Implication in Adrenergic Activation

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 974-986

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000478680

关键词

Angiogenesis; Adipose tissues; Cold exposure; Time course; Adrenergic activation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200886]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580856]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2016JQ8021]
  4. Science Foundation for Postdoctoral Scientists of Shaanxi Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: To characterize the temporal profile of cold-induced angiogenesis in brown and white adipose tissues of mice in vivo and the temporal changes of angiogenic factors in primary mice brown (BA) and white adipocytes (WA) treated with beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist (CL316,243) in vitro. Methods: 8-week old male C57BL/6J mice were individually housed in conventional cages under cold exposure (4 degrees C) for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 days. Interscapular brown adipose tissue (iBAT), inguinal subcutaneous (sWAT) and epididymal white adipose tissues (eWAT) were harvested for immunohistochemical and gene expression analysis. In vitro, primary mice BA and WA treated with or without CL316,243 were harvested for gene expression and protein secretion analysis. Results: A combination of morphological and genetic (Vegfa, Vegfr2, Hif-1 alpha, Pai1 and Pedf) analyses demonstrated depot-specific angiogenesis in response to cold exposure. Upon CL316,243 treatment, angiogenic factors (Vegfa, Vegfr2, Hif-1 alpha, Pai1 and Pedf) and secreted protein VEGFA were transiently increased in both BA and WA. Conclusion: Our results show that iBAT is highly responsive to cold-induced angiogenesis that is mainly supported by sWAT with a lesser extent by eWAT. Moreover, the angiogenesis is a transient process with the angiogenic factors may work in an autocrine/paracrine manner. (C) 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据