4.5 Article

In Pichia pastoris, growth rate regulates protein synthesis and secretion, mating and stress response

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 511-525

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201300334

关键词

Filamentous growth; Recombinant protein secretion; Specific growth rate; Unfolded protein response; Yeast

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF): Doctoral Program BioToP-Biomolecular Technology of Proteins [FWF W1224]
  2. Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth (BMWFJ)
  3. Federal Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and Technology (bmvit)
  4. Styrian Business Promotion Agency SFG
  5. Standortagentur Tirol
  6. ZIT - Technology Agency of the City of Vienna through the COMET-Funding Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein production in yeasts is related to the specific growth rate . To elucidate on this correlation, we studied the transcriptome of Pichia pastoris at different specific growth rates by cultivating a strain secreting human serum albumin at = 0.015 to 0.15 h(-1) in glucose-limited chemostats. Genome-wide regulation revealed that translation-related as well as mitochondrial genes were upregulated with increasing , while autophagy and other proteolytic processes, carbon source-responsive genes and other targets of the TOR pathway as well as many transcriptional regulators were downregulated at higher . Mating and sporulation genes were most active at intermediate of 0.05 and 0.075 h(-1). At very slow growth ( = 0.015 h(-1)) gene regulation differs significantly, affecting many transporters and glucose sensing. Analysis of a subset of genes related to protein folding and secretion reveals that unfolded protein response targets such as translocation, endoplasmic reticulum genes, and cytosolic chaperones are upregulated with increasing growth rate while proteolytic degradation of secretory proteins is downregulated. We conclude that a high positively affects specific protein secretion rates by acting on multiple cellular processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据