4.3 Article

Characterization of Hydrogen Production by Engineered Escherichia coli Strains Using Rich Defined Media

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 686-695

出版社

KOREAN SOC BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1007/s12257-009-3139-4

关键词

hydrogen production; hydrogenase; metabolic engineering; mixed-acid fermentation; rich defined media

资金

  1. US DoE [DE-FG02-ER1577]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fermentation conditions (e.g., pressure and medium) are well-documented to impact the yield of microbial products in bioreactors. In this study we used carefully controlled batch fermentations to characterize hydrogen production from engineered strains of Escherichia coli and developed a rapid method of inducing hydrogen production in previously aerobically grown cells by using a rich defined medium. Our results indicated that rich defined media activated hydrogen production from aerobic pre-cultures with no lag time and yielded more hydrogen and biomass than the commonly used minimal media. Under these conditions, deletion of both uptake hydrogenase 1 (Delta hyaAB) and hydrogenase 2 (Delta hybABC) was shown to increase hydrogen yield from glucose by 10% over the wildtype strain BW25113. However, the deletion of the repressor for the formate-hydrogen-lyase (FHL-1) complex (Delta hycA) did not further increase hydrogen production. Additional deletion of lactate dehydrogenase (ldhA) and fumarate reductase (frdBC) of the mixed-acid fermentation pathway increased hydrogen yield by 22 and 23%, respectively. Interestingly, combined elimination of ldhA and frdBC in the uptake and hycA null strain increased hydrogen yield from 1.37 to 1.82 mol/mol glucose, obtaining 91% of the theoretical maximum hydrogen yield. Our results indicated the advantage of using rich defined media for inducing hydrogen production. This study represents the first report of characterizing metabolically engineered E. coli strains in batch hydrogen fermentation using rich defined media under tightly controlled conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据