4.6 Article

Tongue Coating Microbiota Community and Risk Effect on Gastric Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 9, 期 21, 页码 4039-4048

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.25280

关键词

Gastric cancer; Tongue coating; Microbiota; Case-control; Biomarkers; Gastric cancer; Tongue coating; Microbiota; Case-control; Biomarkers

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81473593, 81473458]
  2. Project of Clinical Scientific Research of Medicine State Administration of TCM [JDZX2015089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although oral hygiene and health have long been reported to be associated with increased risk of gastric cancer (GC), the direct relationship of oral microbes with the risk of GC have not been evaluated fully. We aimed to test whether tongue coating microbiome was associated with GC risk. Methods: Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene of tongue coating microbiome was used in 57 newly diagnosed gastric adenocarcinomas and 80 healthy controls. Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) was applied for multiple comparison correction. Co-abundance group (CAGs) analysis was adopted. Results: We found that higher relative abundance of Firmicutes, and lower of Bacteroidetes were associated with increased risk of GC. In genus level, Streptococcus trended with a higher risk of GC, the four other genera (Neisseria, Prevotella, Prevotella7, and Porphyromonas) were found to have a decreased risk of GC. Different from overall GC and non-cardia cancer, Alloprevotella and Veillonella trended with the higher risk of cardia cancer. Finally, we analyzed the microbiota by determining CAGs and six clusters were identified. Except the Cluster 2 (mainly Streptococcus and Abiotrophia), the other clusters had an inverse association with GC. Of them, the Cluster 6 (mainly Prevotella and Prevotella7 etc) had a relatively good classification power with 0.76 of AUC. Conclusion: Microbiome in tongue coating may have potential guiding value for early detection and prevention of GC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据