4.7 Article

Tunable ESIPT reaction and antioxidant activities of 3-hydroxyflavone and its derivatives by altering atomic electronegativity

期刊

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 5, 期 23, 页码 3435-3442

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8qo00998h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11574115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of atomic electronegativity (O, S and Se atoms) on the excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) properties of three compounds (3-HF, 3-HTF and 3-HSeF) were systematically studied using the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) methods. Furthermore, the antioxidant activities of the three compounds were evaluated using different parameters from the perspective of biological activities. The calculated results indicate that the generation of ESIPT is attributed to the excited-state intramolecular charge transfer owing to the change in electron density distribution on the frontier molecular orbitals and natural bond orbital (NBO) charge distribution of the O-1 and O-2 atoms at the S-0 and S-1 states. Moreover, 3-HTF shows the greatest red shift of the O-1-H-1 stretching peak and the lowest energy barrier at the S-1 state among the three compounds, implying that 3-HTF would have the strongest intramolecular hydrogen bond at the S-1 state, which is most beneficial for the occurrence of ESIPT. In addition, the decreased ionization potentials and energy gaps from 3-HF to 3-HTF and 3-HSeF means that the antioxidant activity of the compound would be enhanced along with the lowered atomic electronegativity. Interestingly, the lower ionization potentials and energy gaps of the compounds in keto forms suggest that the compound (3-HTF) easy to carry out ESIPT reaction would exhibit efficient antioxidant activity, which would establish the relationship between ESIPT reaction and antioxidant activity of the compound and provide a new notion for synthesizing more efficient antioxidants in experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据