4.6 Review

Host Cell Protein Testing by ELISAs and the Use of Orthogonal Methods

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 111, 期 12, 页码 2367-2379

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25327

关键词

host cell proteins; ELISA; multi-analyte; linearity; antigen excess; orthogonal methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Host cell proteins (HCPs) are among the process-related impurities monitored during recombinant protein pharmaceutical process development. The challenges of HCP detection include (1) low levels of residual HCPs present in large excess of product protein, (2) the assay must measure a large number of different protein analytes, and (3) the population of HCP species may change during process development. Suitable methods for measuring process-related impurities are needed to support process development, process validation, and control system testing. A multi-analyte enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the workhorse method for HCP testing due to its high throughput, sensitivity and selectivity. However, as the anti-HCP antibodies, the critical reagents for HCP ELISA, do not comprehensively recognize all the HCP species, it is especially important to ensure that weak and non-immunoreactive HCPs are not overlooked by the ELISA. In some cases limited amount of antibodies to HCP species or antigen excess causes dilution-dependent non-linearity with multi-product HCP ELISA. In our experience, correct interpretation of assay data can lead to isolation and identification of co-purifying HCP with the product in some cases. Moreover, even if the antibodies for a particular HCP are present in the reagent, the corresponding HCP may not be readily detected in the ELISA due to antibody/antigen binding conditions and availability of HCP epitopes. This report reviews the use of the HCP ELISA, discusses its limitations, and demonstrates the importance of orthogonal methods, including mass spectrometry, to complement the platform HCP ELISA for support of process development. In addition, risk and impact assessment for low-level HCPs is also outlined, with consideration of clinical information. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据