4.6 Article

Microfluidic Perfusion Culture of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Under Fully Defined Culture Conditions

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 111, 期 5, 页码 937-947

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25150

关键词

human induced pluripotent stem cells; defined culture conditions; monolayer culture; microchamber array; perfusion culture; cell-based assay

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25650049] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are a promising cell source for drug screening. For this application, self-renewal or differentiation of the cells is required, and undefined factors in the culture conditions are not desirable. Microfluidic perfusion culture allows the production of small volume cultures with precisely controlled microenvironments, and is applicable to high-throughput cellular environment screening. Here, we developed a microfluidic perfusion culture system for hiPSCs that uses a microchamber array chip under defined extracellular matrix (ECM) and culture medium conditions. By screening various ECMs we determined that fibronectin and laminin are appropriate for microfluidic devices made out of the most popular material, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). We found that the growth rate of hiPSCs under pressure-driven perfusion culture conditions was higher than under static culture conditions in the microchamber array. We applied our new system to self-renewal and differentiation cultures of hiPSCs, and immunocytochemical analysis showed that the state of the hiPSCs was successfully controlled. The effects of three antitumor drugs on hiPSCs were comparable between microchamber array and 96-well plates. We believe that our system will be a platform technology for future large-scale screening of fully defined conditions for differentiation cultures on integrated microfluidic devices. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014;111: 937-947. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据