Electrostatic Properties of Confluent Caco-2 Cell Layer Correlates to Their Microvilli Growth and Determines Underlying Transcellular Flow

Recently, Rajapaksa et al. (2010) showed that the rate of uptake of potential vaccine delivery nanoparticles in the mucosal layer is a function of the electrostatic properties of the corresponding solvent. This fundamentally implies that the dominant driving forces that may be capitalized on for mucosal vaccine strategies are electrostatic in nature. We hypothesize that the driving force normal to the cell (in the direction from apical to basolateral across the cell) is of particular importance. In addition, it has been theoretically shown that the electrostatic properties of mucosal cells are directly related to their development of brush border. Here we correlate the development of brush border on a human mucosal epithelial model (Caco-2) cultured in DMEM on 3.0 mu m pore sized polycarbonate membranes to their corresponding electrostatic properties characterized by measuring their normal zeta potential. Properties of normal streaming potential, hydraulic permeability, and brush border development (as determined by size and number) were monitored for 2, 6, and 16 days (after cells were confluent). Human endothelial cells (HECs), which lack brush border, were used as the control. Our results demonstrate that normal zeta potential of Caco-2 cells significantly changed from -5.7 +/- 0.11mV to -3.4 +/- 0.11mV for a period between 2 and 16 days, respectively. The zeta potential of the control cell line, HECs, stayed constant (statistically not different, P>0.05) for the duration of the experiments. Our results show that the calculated increase in surface area of the Caco-2 cells with microvilli from 6 to 16 days was directly proportional to the corresponding measured zeta potential difference. These results imply that microvilli alter the electrostatic local environment around Caco-2 cells and, hence, enhance the normal electrostatic selective transport of solute across the mucosal barrier. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013;110: 2742-2748. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.