4.6 Article

Development of thermostable Candida antarctica lipase B through novel in silico design of disulfide bridge

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 109, 期 4, 页码 867-876

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24371

关键词

Candida antarctica lipase B; thermal stability; disulfide bridge; B-factor of residue pairs; flexibility of residue pairs; MODIP; disulfide by design

资金

  1. MKE/KEIT [10031717]
  2. NRF [2011K000661]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10031717] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipase B from Candida antarctica (CalB) is a versatile biocatalyst for various bioconversions. In this study, the thermostability of CalB was improved through the introduction of a new disulfide bridge. Analysis of the B-factors of residue pairs in CalB wild type (CalB-WT) followed by simple flexibility analysis of residues in CalB-WT and its designated mutants using FIRST server were newly proposed to enhance the selective power of two computational tools (MODIP and DbD v1.20) to predict the possible disulfide bonds in proteins for the enhancement of thermostability. Five residue pairs (A162-K308, N169-F304, Q156-L163, S50-A273, and S239C-D252C) were chosen and the respective amino acid residues were mutated to cysteine. In the results, CalB A162C-K308C showed greatly improved thermostability while maintaining its catalytic efficiency compared to that of CalB-WT. Remarkably, the temperature at which 50% of its activity remained after 60-min incubation (T?5060) of CalB A162C_K308C was increased by 8.5 degrees C compared to that of CalB-WT (55 and 46.5 degrees C, respectively). Additionally, the half-life at 50 degrees C of CalB A162C-K308C was 4.5-fold higher than that of CalB-WT (220 and 49?min, respectively). The improvement of thermostability of CalB A162C-K308C was elucidated at the molecular level by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:867876. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据