4.6 Article

Oxygen Supply Controls the Onset of Pristinamycins Production by Streptomyces pristinaespiralis in Shaking Flasks

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 108, 期 9, 页码 2151-2161

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23177

关键词

Streptomyces; power dissipation; nutrient limitation; pristinamycins production; shaking flask

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics are secondary metabolites, generally produced during stationary phase of growth under different nutritional and hydrodynamic stresses. However, the exact mechanisms of the induction of antibiotics production are still not clearly established. In a previous study, the induction of pristinamycins production by Streptomyces pristinaespiralis as well as product concentrations were correlated with power dissipation per unit of volume (P/V) in shaking flasks. In this study, detailed kinetics of growth, substrate consumption, oxygen transfer rate and pristinamycins production under varying P/V conditions have been obtained and analyzed. Our results showed that higher P/V resulted in a higher concentration of biomass and promoted an earlier nutrient limitation and ultimately an earlier induction of pristinamycins production. The maximal specific growth rate, specific oxygen consumption rate and specific consumption rate of glutamate increased with P/V while influence was less marked with specific consumption rate of glucose, arginine, ammonium ions and phosphate. When oxygen uptake rate (OUR) was limited by free-surface oxygen transfer, pristinamycins production was not detected despite the occurrence of nitrogen and/or phosphate sources limitation. The threshold value for OUR observed was around 25 mmol L(-1) h(-1). This suggested that a limitation in nitrogen and/or phosphate alone was not sufficient to induce pristinamycins production by S. pristinaespiralis pr11. To induce this production, the oxygen transfer had to be non-limiting. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108: 2151-2161. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据