4.6 Article

A Limited LCA of Bio-Adipic Acid: Manufacturing the Nylon-6,6 Precursor Adipic Acid Using the Benzoic Acid Degradation Pathway From Different Feedstocks

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 108, 期 6, 页码 1298-1306

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23074

关键词

adipic acid; biotechnology; cis; cis-muconic acid; energy; exergy; LCA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A limited life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed on a combined biological and chemical process for the production of adipic acid, which was compared to the traditional petrochemical process. The LCA comprises the biological conversion of the aromatic feedstocks benzoic acid, impure aromatics, toluene, or phenol from lignin to cis, cis-muconic acid, which is subsequently converted to adipic acid through hydrogenation. Apart from the impact of usage of petrochemical and biomass-based feedstocks, the environmental impact of the final concentration of cis, cismuconic acid in the fermentation broth was studied using 1.85% and 4.26% cis, cis-muconic acid. The LCA focused on the cumulative energy demand (CED), cumulative exergy demand (CExD), and the CO(2) equivalent (CO(2)eq) emission, with CO(2) and N(2)O measured separately. The highest calculated reduction potential of CED and CExD were achieved using phenol, which reduced the CED by 29% and 57% with 1.85% and 4.26% cis, cis-muconic acid, respectively. A decrease in the CO(2)eq emission was especially achieved when the N(2)O emission in the combined biological and chemical process was restricted. At 4.26% cis, cis-muconic acid, the different carbon backbone feedstocks contributed to an optimized reduction of CO(2)eq emissions ranging from 14.0 to 17.4 ton CO(2)eq/ton adipic acid. The bulk of the bioprocessing energy intensity is attributed to the hydrogenation reactor, which has a high environmental impact and a direct relationship with the product concentration in the broth. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108: 1298-1306. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据