4.6 Article

Estrogens determination in wastewater samples by automatic in-syringe dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction prior silylation and gas chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1413, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.031

关键词

In-syringe magnetic stirring-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (in-syringe-MSA-DLLME); Gas chromatography (GC); Estrogens; Wastewater samples; Automation

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) - FEDER funds [CTQ2013-47461-R]
  2. Torres Quevedo Program of MINECO - European Funds [PTQ-2012-05755]
  3. Son Anglada Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new procedure for the extraction, preconcentration and simultaneous determination of the estrogens most used in contraception pharmaceuticals (estrone, 17 beta-estradiol, estriol, and 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol), cataloged as Contaminants of Emergent Concern by the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States (US-EPA), is proposed. The developed system performs an in-syringe magnetic stirring-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (in-syringe-MSA-DLLME) prior derivatization and gas chromatography (GC-MS). Different extraction (carbon tetrachloride, ethyl acetate, chloroform and trichloroethylene) and disperser solvents (acetone, acetonitrile and methanol) were tested. Chloroform and acetone were chosen as extraction and disperser solvent, respectively, as they provided the best extraction efficiency. Then, a multivariate optimization of the extraction conditions was carried out. Derivatization conditions were also studied to ensure the conversion of the estrogens to their respective trimethylsilyl derivatives. Low LODs and LOQs were achieved, i.e. between 11 and 82 ng L-1, and 37 and 272 ng L-1, respectively. Good values for intra and inter-day precision were obtained (RSDs <= 7.06% and RSD <= 7.11%, respectively). The method was successfully applied to wastewater samples. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据