4.6 Article

Effect of Sulfur Oxyanions on Lignocellulose-Derived Fermentation Inhibitors

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 108, 期 11, 页码 2592-2599

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23244

关键词

inhibitors; lignocellulose hydrolysates; liquid biofuels; detoxification; reducing agents; sulfur oxyanions

资金

  1. Kempe Foundations
  2. The Knut Foundation
  3. Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. UPSC Berzelii Centre for Forest Biotechnology
  5. Bio4Energy
  6. SEKAB E-Technology (Ornskoldsvik, Sweden) through the Umea University Industrial Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent results show that treatments with reducing agents, including the sulfur oxyanions dithionite and hydrogen sulfite, efficiently improve the fermentability of inhibitory lignocellulose hydrolysates, and that the treatments are effective when the reducing agents are added in situ into the fermentation vessel at low temperature. In the present investigation, dithionite was added to medium with model inhibitors (coniferyl aldehyde, furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, or acetic acid) and the effects on the fermentability with yeast were studied. Addition of 10 mM dithionite to medium containing 2.5 mM coniferyl aldehyde resulted in a nine-fold increase in the glucose consumption rate and a three-fold increase in the ethanol yield. To investigate the mechanism behind the positive effects of adding sulfur oxyanions, mixtures containing 2.5 mM of a model inhibitor (an aromatic compound, a furan aldehyde, or an aliphatic acid) and 15 mM dithionite or hydrogen sulfite were analyzed using mass spectrometry (MS). The results of the analyses, which were performed by using UHPLC-ESI-TOF-MS and UHPLC-LTQ/Orbitrap-MS/MS, indicate that the positive effects of sulfur oxyanions are primarily due to their capability to react with and sulfonate inhibitory aromatic compounds and furan aldehydes at low temperature and slightly acidic pH (such as 25 degrees C and pH 5.5). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108: 2592-2599. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据