4.6 Article

Inhibitory effects of the macrolide antimicrobial tylosin on anaerobic treatment

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 73-82

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21864

关键词

anaerobic; antimicrobial; macrolide; methanogenesis; SBR; tylosin

资金

  1. Centro de Investigacion y Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV), Mexico
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT), Mexico
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture [AG 58-3620-1-179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A laboratory-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) was operated using a glucose-based synthetic wastewater to study the effects of tylosin, a macrolide antimicrobial commonly used in swine production, on treatment performance. The experimental period was divided into three consecutive phases with different influent tylosin concentrations (0, 1.67, and 167 mg/L. The addition of 1.67 mg/L tylosin to the reactor had negligible effects oil the overall treatment performance, that is, total methane production and effluent chemical oxygen demand did not change significantly (P < 0.05), yet analyses of individual ASBR cycles revealed a decrease in the rates of both methane production and propionate uptake after tylosin was added. The addition of 167 mg/L tylosin to the reactor resulted in a gradual decrease in methane production and the accumulation of propionate and acetate. Subsequent inhibition of methanogenesis was attributed to a decrease in the pH of the reactor. After the addition of 167 mg/L tylosin to the reactor, an initial decrease in the rate of glucose uptake during the ASBR cycle followed by a gradual recovery was observed. In batch tests, the specific biogas production with the substrate butyrate was completely inhibited in the presence of tylosin. This study indicated that tylosin inhibited propionate and butyrate-oxidizing syntrophic bacteria and fermenting bacteria resulting in unfavorable effects on methanogenesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008;101: 73-82. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据