4.0 Article

Renal potassium handling in carriers of the Gly40Ser mutation of the glucagon receptor suggests a role for glucagon in potassium homeostasis

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13661

关键词

Glucose; Insulin; Mendelian randomization; Sodium; TTKG; Urea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma potassium concentration (P-K) is tightly regulated. Insulin is known to favor potassium entry into cells. But how potassium leaves the cells later on is not often considered. Previous studies in rats showed that glucagon infusion increased urinary potassium excretion dose-dependently and reversibly. This prompted us to investigate the possible influence of glucagon on potassium handling in humans. We took advantage of the Gly40Ser mutation of the glucagon receptor (GR) that results in a partial loss of function of the GR. In the Olivetti cohort (male workers), 25 subjects who carried this mutation were matched 1:4 to 100 noncarriers for age and weight. Estimated osmolarity of serum and 24-h urine (S-osm and U-osm,U- respectively) was calculated from the concentrations of the main solutes: [(Na + K)*2 + urea (+glucose for serum)]. Transtubular potassium gradient (TTKG), reflecting the intensity of K secretion in the distal nephron, was calculated as [(urine K/serum K)(U-osm/S-osm)]. There was no significant difference in serum K, or 24-h urine urea, Na and K excretion rates. But urine K concentration was significantly lower in carriers than in noncarriers. Means (interquartile range): 38 (34-43) versus 47 (43-51) mmol/L, P = 0.030. TTKG was also significantly lower in carriers: 4.2 (3.9-4.6) versus 5.0 (4.7-5.2), P = 0.015. This difference remained statistically significant after adjustments for serum insulin and 24-h Na and urea excretions. These results in humans suggest that glucagon stimulates K secretion in the distal nephron. Thus, in conjunction with insulin, glucagon may also participate in K homeostasis by promoting renal K excretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据