4.7 Review

Perspectives on engineering strategies for improving biofuel production from microalgae - A critical review

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1448-1459

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.09.002

关键词

Microalgae; Biofuel; Environmental stress; Engineering operation strategy; Fed-batch operation; Semi-continuous operation; Continuous operation; Two-stage operation; Salinity-gradient operation

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) [P07015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the potential for biofuel production from microalgae via photosynthesis has been intensively investigated, information on the selection of a suitable operation strategy for microalgae-based biofuel production is lacking. Many published reports describe competitive strains and optimal culture conditions for use in biofuel production; however, the major impediment to further improvements is the absence of effective engineering strategies for microalgae cultivation and biofuel production. This comprehensive review discusses recent advances in understanding the effects of major environmental stresses and the characteristics of various engineering operation strategies on the production of biofuels (mainly biodiesel and bioethanol) using microalgae. The performances of microalgae-based biofuel-producing systems under various environmental stresses (i.e., irradiance, temperature, pH, nitrogen depletion, and salinity) and cultivation strategies (i.e., fed-batch, semi-continuous, continuous, two-stage, and salinity-gradient) are compared. The reasons for variations in performance and the underlying theories of the various production strategies are also critically discussed. The aim of this review is to provide useful information to facilitate development of innovative and feasible operation technologies for effectively increasing the commercial viability of microalgae-based biofuel production. (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据