4.4 Review

Effects of elastic therapeutic taping on motor function in children with motor impairments: a systematic review

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 40, 期 14, 页码 1609-1617

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1304581

关键词

Disabled children; child development; motor skills; therapeutic taping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The elastic therapeutic taping has been considered a promising resource for disabled children. Objective: To systematically review the evidence of the effects of elastic therapeutic taping on motor function in children with motor impairments. Method: Three independent evaluators conducted searches in electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, BIREME/BVS, Science Direct, SciELO, and PEDro). Clinical studies design, published until 2016, involving elastic therapeutic taping and children aged 0-12 years with motor impairments were included. The variables considered were the methodological aspects (study design, participants, outcome measurements, and experimental conditions); results presented in the studies, and also the methodological quality of studies. Results: Final selection was composed by 12 manuscripts (five randomized controlled trials), published in the last 10 years. Among them, cerebral palsy (CP) was the most recurrent disorder (n=7), followed by congenital muscular torticollis (n=2) and brachial plexus palsy (n=2). Positive results were associated with taping application: improvement in the upper limb function, gross motor skills, postural control, muscular balance, and performance in the dynamics functional and daily activities. Limitations: Lower quality of the studies, clinical and population heterogeneity existed across studies. Conclusions: The elastic therapeutic taping has been shown to be a promising adjunct resource to the conventional rehabilitation in children with motor impairments. However, high methodological studies about its efficacy in this population are already scarce.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据