4.7 Review

Role of genetic factors and environmental conditions in recombinant protein production for molecular farming

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 914-923

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.07.004

关键词

Environmental factors; Glycoprotein; Glycosylation; Molecular farming; Recombinant protein; Transgenic plant

资金

  1. Biogreen 21 RAMP
  2. D Project of Rural Development Administration [KRF-2006-331-F00021]
  3. Korean government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants are generally considered to represent a promising heterologous expression system for the production of valuable recombinant proteins. Minimal upstream plant production cost is a salient feature driving the development of plant expression systems used for the synthesis of recombinant proteins For Such a plant expression system to be fully effective, it is first essential to improve plant productivity by plant biomass after inserting genes of interest into a suitable plant. Plant productivity is related closely to its growth and development, both of which are affected directly by environmental factors These environmental factors that affect the cultivation conditions mainly include temperature. light, Salinity. drought, nutrition, insects and pests. In addition, genetic factors that affect gene expression at the transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels are considered to be important factors related to gene expression in plants Thus. these factors influence both the quality and quantity of recombinant protein produced in transgenic plants Among the genetic factors, the post-translational process is of particular interest as it Influences subcellular localization, protein glycosylation, assembly and folding of therapeutic proteins. consequently affecting both protein quantity and biological quality. In this review, we discuss the effects of cultivation condition and genetic factors on recombinant protein production in transgenic plants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据