4.6 Article

Assessment of the orthogonality in two-dimensional separation systems using criteria defined by the maximal information coefficient

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1415, 期 -, 页码 108-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.049

关键词

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography; Maximal information coefficient; Maximal information-based nonparametric exploration; Abraham solvation parameter model; Orthogonality of 2-D separation system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method based on the maximal information coefficient (MIC) is developed to assess the orthogonality of comprehensive two-dimensional separation systems. The proposed method is based on a modification of Marriott's method, which was previously reported in 2013. Marriott's method relies on the calculation of two separate parameters. The first term is C-pert which defines the peak coverage percent in separation space, and the second is C-peaks which corresponds to 2-D distribution correlation of the peaks. Marriott's method for estimating the values of C-peaks is based on the calculation of the coefficient of determination (R2) between the retention indices of the peaks. Herein, we present some examples where R2 is an inefficient way to estimate the values of C-peaks. The results in this work illustrate that when there are either functional or non-functional local dependencies between the distributions of the peaks, R2 values fail to thoroughly estimate the values of C-peaks. We proposed using the MIC instead of R2 to estimate the values of C-peaks for orthogonality calculations. Simulations of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograms were performed using the Abraham solvation parameter model in order to generate examples for orthogonality assessment. The results indicate that the suggested modifications in this work correct the shortcomings of Marriott's model, and the proposed equation accurately measures the column dependencies in 2-0 separation systems. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据