4.6 Article

Neuroinflammation and Tau Interact with Amyloid in Predicting Sleep Problems in Aging Independently of Atrophy

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 2775-2785

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx157

关键词

atrophy; depression; memory; MRI; YKL-40

资金

  1. National Association for Public Health's dementia research program, Norway
  2. Norwegian Research Council
  3. European Research Council
  4. Medical Student Research Program at the University of Oslo
  5. Innlandet Hospital Trust [150201]
  6. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  7. Swedish Research Council [2013-2546, K2013-61X-14002-13-5]
  8. Torsten Soderberg Foundation at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sleep problems relate to brain changes in aging and disease, but the mechanisms are unknown. Studies suggest a relationship between beta-amyloid (A beta) accumulation and sleep, which is likely augmented by interactions with multiple variables. Here, we tested how different cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for brain pathophysiology, brain atrophy, memory function, and depressive symptoms predicted self-reported sleep patterns in 91 cognitively healthy older adults over a 3-year period. The results showed that CSF levels of total- and phosphorylated (P) tau, and YKL-40-a marker of neuroinflammation/astroglial activation-predicted poor sleep in A beta positive older adults. Interestingly, although brain atrophy was strongly predictive of poor sleep, the relationships between CSF biomarkers and sleep were completely independent of atrophy. A joint analysis showed that unique variance in sleep was explained by P-tau and the P-tau x A beta interaction, memory function, depressive symptoms, and brain atrophy. The results demonstrate that sleep relates to a range of different pathophysiological processes, underscoring the importance of understanding its impact on neurocognitive changes in aging and people with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据