4.5 Article

Multiple consecutive recapture of rigid nanoparticles using a solid-state nanopore sensor

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 39, 期 5-6, 页码 833-843

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201700329

关键词

Automated feedback control system; Biomolecules; Solid nanoparticle; Solid-state nanopore; Recapture

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R03EB022759]
  2. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1707818]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2015K1A4A3047100, NRF-2015M3A7B6027973, NRF-2015M3A6B3068660]
  4. NNFC [COI1710M001]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R03EB022759] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-state nanopore sensors have been used to measure the size of a nanoparticle by applying a resistive pulse sensing technique. Previously, the size distribution of the population pool could be investigated utilizing data from a single translocation, however, the accuracy of the distribution is limited due to the lack of repeated data. In this study, we characterized polystyrene nanobeads utilizing single particle recapture techniques, which provide a better statistical estimate of the size distribution than that of single sampling techniques. The pulses and translocation times of two different sized nanobeads (80nm and 125nm in diameter) were acquired repeatedly as nanobeads were recaptured multiple times using an automated system controlled by custom-built scripts. The drift-diffusion equation was solved to find good estimates for the configuration parameters of the recapture system. The results of the experiment indicated enhancement of measurement precision and accuracy as nanobeads were recaptured multiple times. Reciprocity of the recapture and capacitive effects in solid state nanopores are discussed. Our findings suggest that solid-state nanopores and an automated recapture system can also be applied to soft nanoparticles, such as liposomes, exosomes, or viruses, to analyze their mechanical properties in single-particle resolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据