4.3 Article

Dynamic changes in the distribution of facial and abdominal adipose tissue correlated with surgical treatment in acromegaly

期刊

ENDOCRINE
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 552-559

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-018-1742-x

关键词

Acromegaly; Adipose tissue; MRI

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0106103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeAcromegaly is a systemic metabolic disease. Growth hormone (GH) have a significant impact on adipose tissue (AT). A huge reduction of serum GH after surgical treatment may cause substantial AT redistribution. The objective of this study was to illustrate the dynamic changes in distribution of facial and abdominal AT correlated with surgical treatment in patients with acromegaly.MethodsAbdominal AT in 17 acromegaly patients (group 1) was studied longitudinally preoperatively and 1 month to 1 year postoperatively. The facial and abdominal subcutaneous AT (fSAT and aSAT) of another 17 acromegaly patients (group 2) were compared with 7 nonfunctional pituitary adenoma (NFPA) controls.The areas of fSAT, aSAT, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were obtained by MRI and quantified by image analysis software, and intrahepatic lipid (IHL) was assessed by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).ResultsAbdominal adipose tissue (aSAT, VAT, and IHL) increased overall after surgical treatment. However, IHL first decreased and then continuously increased during the follow-up. Compared with the increased amount of aSAT, the fSAT amount decreased after surgical treatment. The inconsistency of this phenomenon did not appear in the NFPA control subjects.ConclusionThe perioperative dynamic distribution of the facial and abdominal fat in acromegaly revealed regional differences in the intricate effect of GH on adipose tissue. Reduction of serum GH after surgical treatment of acromegaly was associated with dynamic increases of IHL, abdominal visceral, and subcutaneous fat, but a reduction of facial subcutaneous fat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据