4.7 Article

Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 78-93

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018

关键词

Distributed power; Energy democracy; Energy politics; Renewable energy transition

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  2. Department of Natural Resource Sciences at McGill University
  3. College of Social Science and Humanities
  4. Global Resilience Institute of Northeastern University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired by the energy democracy movement, this conceptual review critically explores relationships between concentrated or distributed renewable energy and political power. Advocates assert that because the renewable energy transition is fundamentally a political struggle, efforts to shift from fossil fuels and decarbonize societies will not prove effective without confronting and destabilizing dominant systems of energy power. The objectives of this paper include: 1) theorizing and exploring the relationships between renewable energy and political power, 2) critically assessing tensions associated with an energy democracy agenda, and 3) drawing out the implications for democratizing renewable energy development in practice. Distributed energy-politics posits that distributed energy sources and technologies enable and organize distributed political power and vice versa. Efforts are underway to find ways to re-organize distributed energy flows into aggregated and concentrated stocks of energy and other forms of political power. More democratic renewable energy futures may benefit from strengthening democratic practices and outcomes, extending democratization of energy systems across all components, stages and end uses, and sharpening positions relative to dominant pressures of capitalism and market ideology, the ideology of unlimited growth, and the modernist/industrialist agenda. Renewable energy systems offer a possibility but not a certainty for more democratic energy futures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据