4.4 Article

Physicochemical and thermodynamic study of malachite green adsorption on raw and modified corn straw

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 779-787

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22948

关键词

adsorption; malachite green; corn straw; thermodynamic functions

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  2. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physicochemical and thermodynamic interpretations of malachite green (MG) adsorption on raw (RCS) and modified corn straw (MCS) are detailed in this work. Experimental isotherms were constructed at different temperatures (from 298 to 328K). To interpret these curves, three models named multilayer model with saturation, double layer model with two energies, and monolayer model with one energy were developed based on the principle of grand canonical ensemble in statistical physics. The double layer model with two energies was the more adequate to represent the adsorption process. Thermodynamic functions such as configurational entropy (S-a), free adsorption enthalpy (G), and internal energy (E-int) were studied. The number of MG molecules per site (n) ranged from 0.33 to 2.33 and the adsorbed quantity at saturation (Q(asat)) ranged from 164.15 to 528.19mgg(-1) and both increased with the temperature. The density of the receptor sites (N-M) ranged from 248.71 to 104.88 and decreased with the temperature. For RCS and MCS, the first and second energies, E-1 and E-2, increased with the temperature, with E-1 being higher than E-2. The adsorption energies of MCS (7.77-11.19kJmol(-1)) were higher than the adsorption energies of RCS (6.17-10.88kJmol(-1)). The adsorption process occurred by physisorption and the disorder increased at low equilibrium concentrations, but decreased at high concentrations. The free enthalpy and internal energy described with care the spontaneity of the studied system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据