4.4 Article

Multitemporal Accuracy and Precision Assessment of Unmanned Aerial System Photogrammetry for Slope-Scale Snow Depth Maps in Alpine Terrain

期刊

PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
卷 175, 期 9, 页码 3303-3324

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-017-1748-y

关键词

Unmanned aerial vehicles; terrestrial laser scanning; manual snow depth probing; digital surface models; validation; error

资金

  1. Austrian Academy of Sciences (OAW) research programme Earth System Sciences (ESS)-International Geoscience Programme (IGCP)/Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable and timely information on the spatio-temporal distribution of snow in alpine terrain plays an important role for a wide range of applications. Unmanned aerial system (UAS) photogrammetry is increasingly applied to cost-efficiently map the snow depth at very high resolution with flexible applicability. However, crucial questions regarding quality and repeatability of this technique are still under discussion. Here we present a multitemporal accuracy and precision assessment of UAS photogrammetry for snow depth mapping on the slope-scale. We mapped a 0.12 km(2) large snow-covered study site, located in a high-alpine valley in Western Austria. 12 UAS flights were performed to acquire imagery at 0.05 m ground sampling distance in visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths with a modified commercial, off-the-shelf sensor mounted on a custom-built fixed-wing UAS. The imagery was processed with structure-from-motion photogrammetry software to generate orthophotos, digital surface models (DSMs) and snow depth maps (SDMs). Accuracy of DSMs and SDMs were assessed with terrestrial laser scanning and manual snow depth probing, respectively. The results show that under good illumination conditions (study site in full sunlight), the DSMs and SDMs were acquired with an accuracy of <= 0.25 and <= 0.29 m (both at 1 sigma), respectively. In case of poorly illuminated snow surfaces (study site shadowed), the NIR imagery provided higher accuracy (0.19 m; 0.23 m) than VIS imagery (0.49 m; 0.37 m). The precision of the UAS(SDMs) was 0.04 m for a small, stable area and below 0.33 m for the whole study site (both at 1 sigma).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据