4.7 Article

Electroanalytical evaluation of temperature dependent electrolyte functions for lithium ion batteries: Investigation of selected mixed carbonate solvents using a lithium titanate electrode

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 395-408

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2018.10.013

关键词

Electrochemical testing; Impedance spectroscopy; Ionic conductivity; Lithium ion battery; Voltammetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterization of materials for advanced lithium ion batteries (LIBs) represents an essential area of the contemporary energy storage technologies. The present work illustrates an electroanalytical framework for quantitative testing of liquid electrolytes for LIBs. The measurements explore a temperature range from 40 degrees C to subzero regimes, with a special focus on the electrolyte functions for low temperature applications. The test electrolytes include different combinations of ethylene, dimethyl, diethyl and ethyl methyl carbonate (EC, DMC, DEC and EMC, respectively) solvents, with LiClO4, Li bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (LiTFSI) and LIBF4 salts. The experiments utilize the diagnostic features of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), in combination with cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic cycling. Temperature controlled measurements of two- and three-electrode EIS, coupled with CV, demonstrate how the electrolyte conductivity and electrochemical stability can be evaluated in a comprehensive approach. The compositions of the test electrolytes are optimized according to their temperature dependent ionic conductivities and their electrochemical windows. Two optimal electrolytes based on EC:EMC and EC:DMC:EMC mixtures are further examined for battery operations by galvanostatic cycling in a half-cell containing a Li(4)Ti(5)O(12 )anode. Consistent with the findings of the conductivity and electrochemical window measurements, the EC:EMC system exhibits superior performance in these half-cell experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据