4.5 Article

Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data

期刊

BIOSTATISTICS
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 539-552

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr034

关键词

Batch effect; Control gene; Differential expression; Factor analysis; SVA; Unwanted variation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation VIGRE
  2. National Institutes of Health [5R01 GM083084-03]
  3. National Cancer Institute [U24 CA126551]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microarray expression studies suffer from the problem of batch effects and other unwanted variation. Many methods have been proposed to adjust microarray data to mitigate the problems of unwanted variation. Several of these methods rely on factor analysis to infer the unwanted variation from the data. A central problem with this approach is the difficulty in discerning the unwanted variation from the biological variation that is of interest to the researcher. We present a new method, intended for use in differential expression studies, that attempts to overcome this problem by restricting the factor analysis to negative control genes. Negative control genes are genes known a priori not to be differentially expressed with respect to the biological factor of interest. Variation in the expression levels of these genes can therefore be assumed to be unwanted variation. We name this method Remove Unwanted Variation, 2-step (RUV-2). We discuss various techniques for assessing the performance of an adjustment method and compare the performance of RUV-2 with that of other commonly used adjustment methods such as Combat and Surrogate Variable Analysis (SVA). We present several example studies, each concerning genes differentially expressed with respect to gender in the brain and find that RUV-2 performs as well or better than other methods. Finally, we discuss the possibility of adapting RUV-2 for use in studies not concerned with differential expression and conclude that there may be promise but substantial challenges remain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据