4.5 Article

Microarray background correction: maximum likelihood estimation for the normal-exponential convolution

期刊

BIOSTATISTICS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 352-363

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn042

关键词

2-color microarray; Background correction; Maximum likelihood; Nelder-Mead algorithm; Newton- Raphson algorithm; Normal-exponential convolution

资金

  1. Allan Harris memorial scholarship
  2. Isaac Newton Trust
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council Program [406657]
  4. NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background correction is an important preprocessing step for microarray data that attempts to adjust the data for the ambient intensity surrounding each feature. The normexp method models the observed pixel intensities as the sum of 2 random variables, one normally distributed and the other exponentially distributed, representing background noise and signal, respectively. Using a saddle-point approximation, Ritchie and others (2007) found normexp to be the best background correction method for 2-color microarray data. This article develops the normexp method further by improving the estimation of the parameters. A complete mathematical development is given of the normexp model and the associated saddle-point approximation. Some subtle numerical programming issues are solved which caused the original normexp method to fail occasionally when applied to unusual data sets. A practical and reliable algorithm is developed for exact maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) using high-quality optimization software and using the saddle-point estimates as starting values. MLE is shown to outperform heuristic estimators proposed by other authors, both in terms of estimation accuracy and in terms of performance on real data. The saddle-point approximation is an adequate replacement in most practical situations. The performance of normexp for assessing differential expression is improved by adding a small offset to the corrected intensities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据