4.8 Article

Development of an ultrasensitive aptasensor for the detection of aflatoxin B1

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 340-344

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.01.045

关键词

Aflatoxin B-1; Aptasensor; RT-qPCR; Feed and food safety

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21305158]
  2. Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest [201403071]
  3. Project of risk assessment on raw milk, Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System of the PR China [nycytx-04-01]
  4. International Collaboration and Communication in Agriculture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contamination of feed and food by aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)), one of the most toxic of the mycotoxins, is a global concern. To prevent food safety scares, and avoid subsequent economic losses due to the recall of contaminated items, methods for the rapid, sensitive and specific detection of AFB(1) at trace levels are much in demand. In this work, a simple, ultrasensitive, and reliable aptasensor is described for the detection of AFB(1). An AFB(1) aptamer was used as a molecular recognition probe, while its complementary DNA played a role as a signal generator for amplification by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Under optimal conditions, a wide linear detection range (5.0 x 10(-5) to 5.0 ng mL(-1)) was achieved, with a high sensitivity (limit of detection (LOD)=25 fg mL(-1)). In addition, the proposed aptasensor exhibited excellent specificity for AFB(1) compared with eight other mycotoxins, with no obvious Ct value change. This aptasensor can also be used in quantifying AFB(1) levels in Chinese wildrye hay samples and infant rice cereal samples, demonstrating satisfactory recoveries in the range of 88-127% and 94-119%, respectively. This detection technique has a significant potential for high-throughput, quantitative determination of mycotoxin levels in a large range of feeds and foods. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据