4.7 Article

Differential effects of type 1 diabetes mellitus and subsequent osteoblastic beta-catenin activation on trabecular and cortical bone in a mouse model

期刊

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s12276-018-0186-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a pathological condition associated with osteopenia. WNT/beta-catenin signaling is implicated in this process. Trabecular and cortical bone respond differently to WNT/beta-catenin signaling in healthy mice. We investigated whether this signaling has different effects on trabecular and cortical bone in T1DM. We first established a streptozotocin-induced T1DM mouse model and then constitutively activated beta-catenin in osteoblasts in the setting of T1DM (T1-CA). The extent of bone loss was greater in trabecular bone than that in cortical bone in T1DM mice, and this difference was consistent with the reduction in the expression of beta-catenin signaling in the two bone compartments. Further experiments demonstrated that in T1DM mice, trabecular bone showed lower levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) than the levels in cortical bone, leading to lower WNT/beta-catenin signaling activity through the inhibition of the IGF-1R/Akt/glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3 beta) pathway. After beta-catenin was activated in T1-CA mice, the bone mass and bone strength increased to substantially greater extents in trabecular bone than those in cortical bone. In addition, the cortical bone of the T1-CA mice displayed an unexpected increase in bone porosity, with increased bone resorption. The downregulated expression of WNT16 might be responsible for these cortical bone changes. In conclusion, we found that although the activation of WNT/beta-catenin signaling increased the trabecular bone mass and bone strength in T1DM mice, it also increased the cortical bone porosity, impairing the bone strength. These findings should be considered in the future treatment of T1DM-related osteopenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据