4.8 Article

Sub-femtomole detection of 16s rRNA from Legionella pneumophila using surface plasmon resonance imaging

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 129-135

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.08.032

关键词

Legionella pneumophila; Surface plasmon resonance imaging; Pathogen detection; 16s rRNA; Quantum dot; Hybridization

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Genome Canada/Genome Quebec
  3. Nano-Quebec
  4. Le Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies-Centre for Biorecognition and Biosensors
  5. NSERC [418289-2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Legionellosis has been and continues to be a life-threatening disease worldwide, even in developed countries. Given the severity and unpredictability of Legionellosis outbreaks, developing a rapid, highly specific, and sensitive detection method is thus of great pertinence. In this paper, we demonstrate that sub-femtomole levels of 16s rRNA from pathogenic Legionella pneumophila can be timely and effectively detected using an appropriate designed capture, detector probes, and a QD SPRi signal amplification strategy. To achieve specific and sensitive detection, optimal hybridization conditions and parameters were implemented. Among these parameters, fragmentation of the 16s rRNA and further signal amplification by QDs were found to be the main parameters contributing to signal enhancement. The appropriate design of the detector probes also increased the sensitivity of the detection system, mainly due to secondary structure of 16s rRNA. The use of 16s rRNA from L. pneumophila allowed for the detection of metabolically active pathogens with high sensitivity. Detection of 16s rRNA in solutions as diluted as 1 pM at 450 mu L (0.45 femtomole) was achieved in less than 3 h, making our approach suitable for the direct, timely, and effective detection of L. pneumophila within man-made water systems. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据