4.8 Article

On-line protein capture on magnetic beads for ultrasensitive microfluidic immunoassays of cancer biomarkers

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 268-274

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.09.054

关键词

Protein detection; Cancer biomarkers; Magentic beads; Immunoarray; Microfluidics

资金

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), NIH, USA [EB014586]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate, sensitive, multiplexed detection of biomarker proteins holds significant promise for personalized cancer diagnostics. Here we describe the incorporation of a novel on-line chamber to capture cancer biomarker proteins on magnetic beads derivatized with 300,000 enzyme labels and 40,000 antibodies into a modular microfluidic immunoarray. Capture and detection chambers are produced from PDMS on machined molds and do not require lithography. Protein analytes are captured from serum or other biological samples in the stirred capture chamber on the beads held in place magnetically. The beads are subsequently washed free of sample components, and wash solutions sent to waste. Removal of the magnet and valve switching sends the magnetic bead-protein bioconjugates into a detection chamber where they are captured on 8 antibody-decorated gold nanoparticle-film sensors and detected amperometrically. Most steps in the immunoassay including protein capture, washing and measurement are incorporated into the device. In simultaneous assays, the microfluidic system gave ultralow detection limits of 5 fg mL(-1) for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and 7 fg mL(-1) for IL-8 in serum. Accuracy was demonstrated by measuring IL-6 and IL-8 in conditioned media from oral cancer cell lines and showing good correlations with standard ELISAs. The on-line capture chamber facilitates rapid, sensitive, repetitive protein separation and measurement in 30 min in a semi-automated system adaptable to multiplexed protein detection. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据