4.8 Article

Carbon dots as fluorescent probes for off-on detection of Cu2+ and L-cysteine in aqueous solution

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 330-335

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.07.042

关键词

Mesoporous silica; Carbon dots; Fluorescent probe; Copper ions; L-cysteine; off-on detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21236003, 21206042, 20925621, 20976054, 21176083]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0825]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B502]
  5. China Scholarship Council
  6. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Australia Function Interfaces Research Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper ion (Cu2+) and L-cysteine (L-Cys) detection is critically important since an abnormal level of Cu2+ or L-Cys is an indicator for many diseases. In this paper, we demonstrate an off-on approach for highly sensitive and selective detection of Cu2+ and L-Cys using carbon dots (CDs) as fluorescent probes. CDs were prepared by using mesoporous silica (MS) spheres as nanoreactors. The binding ability of CDs towards metal ions was examined by comparing the fluorescence intensities of CDs before and after the addition of the metal ions. The addition of Cu2+ cations leads to their absorption on the surface of CDs and the significant fluorescence quench of CDs (turn-off). The resulting in CDs-Cu2+ system was found to be sensitive to L-Cys. The addition of L-Cys not only serves to shelter the CDs effectively from being quenched, but also to reverse the quenching and restore the fluorescence (turn-on) due to its ability to remove Cu2+ from the surface of CDs. This method is facile, rapid, low cost, and environment-friendly. A detection limit as low as 2.3 x 10(-8) M for Cu2+ and 3.4 x 10(-10) M for L-Cys is obtained, which is promising for biological applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据