4.8 Article

A simple and sensitive immunoassay for the determination of human chorionic gonadotropin by graphene-based chemiluminescence resonance energy transfer

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 72-77

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.10.033

关键词

Chemiluminescence resonance energy transfer; Human chorionic gonadotropin; Graphene; Magnetic separation; Immunoassay

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21207044]
  2. Hubei Provincial Population and Family Planning Commission [JS-2012005]
  3. National Basic research Grant (973) of China [2009CB320301]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0178]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2012QN239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we report a strategy of chemiluminescence resonance energy transfer (CRET) using graphene as an efficient long-range energy acceptor. Magnetic nanoparticles were also used in CRET for simple magnetic separation and immobilization of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled anti-HCG antibody. In the design of CRET system, the sandwich-type immunocomplex was formed between human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG, antigen) and two different antibodies bridged the magnetic nanoparticles and graphene (acceptors), which led to the occurrence of CRET from chemiluminescence light source to graphene. After optimizing the experimental conditions, the quenching of chemiluminescence signal depended linearly on the concentration of HCG in the range of 0.1 mIU mL(-1)-10 mIU mL(-1) and the detection limit was 0.06 mIU mL(-)1. The proposed method was successfully applied for the determination of HCG levels in saliva and serum samples, and the results were in good agreement with the plate ELISA with colorimetric detection. It could also be developed for detection of other antigen-antibody immune complexes by using the corresponding antigens and respective antibodies. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据