4.8 Article

Dual phase enhanced superior electrochemical performance of nanoporous bismuth-tin alloy anodes for magnesium-ion batteries

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 351-360

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.023

关键词

Magnesium-ion batteries; Anode; Dual phase; Dealloying; Nanoporous alloy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671115, 11674052]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province
  3. Young Tip-top Talent Support Project (the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the CPC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium-ion batteries (MIBs) have recently received great concerns, but are restrained by the challenge of exploring advanced anode materials with superior capacity and fast diffusion kinetics. Herein, for the first time we proposed a dual phase alloying strategy to address this issue, and developed novel high-performance bismuth (Bi)-tin (Sn) alloys with a unique nanoporous structure and high density of phase boundaries. As an anode for MIBs, the dual phase Bi-Sn alloys exhibit excellent Mg storage properties as compared to their single phase counterparts. Specially, the Bi6Sn4 electrode can deliver large discharge specific capacity (434 mA h g(-1) at 50 mA g(-1)), good cycling stability (280 mA h g(-1) after 200 cycles), greatly improved rate capability (362 mA h g(-1) at 1000 mA g(-1)) and high Coulombic efficiency (close to 99% after 30 cycles). Ex situ X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy further clarify the phase and structural evolution during the first discharge/charge processes of the Bi6Sn4 anode. The superior electrochemical performance of the Bi-Sn alloys is attributed to the increased phase/grain boundaries which can provide more channels for fast Mg2+ transport as well as unique nanoporous structure which can accommodate large volume changes and shorten diffusion lengths. The present strategy provides useful information on design of high-performance anode materials for MIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据